@Article{DiasJśniorCFDSBMWSP:2022:InPlBo,
author = "Dias J{\'u}nior, Cl{\'e}o Quaresma and Carneiro, Rayonil Gomes
and Fisch, Gilberto and D'Oliveira, Fl{\'a}vio Augusto F. and
S{\"o}rgel, Matthias and Bot{\'{\i}}a, Santiago and Machado,
Luiz Augusto Toledo and Wolff, Stefan and Santos, Rosa Maria N.
dos and P{\"o}hlker, Christopher",
affiliation = "{Instituto Federal do Par{\'a} (IFPA)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidade de Taubat{\'e}
(UNITAU)} and {Universidade Federal do Par{\'a} (UFPA)} and {Max
Planck Institute for Chemistry} and {Max Planck Institute for
Biogeochemistry} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Max Planck Institute for Chemistry} and {Univesidade
do Estado do Amazonas (UEA)} and {Max Planck Institute for
Chemistry}",
title = "Intercomparison of Planetary Boundary Layer Heights Using Remote
Sensing Retrievals and ERA5 Reanalysis over Central Amazonia",
journal = "Remote Sensing",
year = "2022",
volume = "14",
number = "18",
pages = "e4561",
month = "Sept",
keywords = "Amazon forest, atmospheric boundary layer, El Nińo, ERA5
simulations, GoAmazon and ATTO projects.",
abstract = "The atmospheric boundary layer height ((Formula presented.)) is a
key parameter in the vertical transport of mass, energy, moisture,
and chemical species between the surface and the free atmosphere.
There is a lack of long-term and continuous observations of
(Formula presented.), however, particularly for remote regions,
such as the Amazon forest. Reanalysis products, such as ERA5, can
fill this gap by providing temporally and spatially resolved
information on (Formula presented.). In this work, we evaluate the
ERA5 estimates of (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)
-ERA5) for two locations in the Amazon and corrected them by means
of ceilometer, radiosondes, and SODAR measurements ((Formula
presented.) -experimental). The experimental data were obtained at
the remote Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) with its pristine
tropical forest cover and the T3 site downwind of the city of
Manaus with a mixture of forest ((Formula presented.)), pasture
((Formula presented.)), and rivers ((Formula presented.)). We
focus on the rather typical year 2014 and the El Nińo year 2015.
The comparison of the experimental vs. ERA5 (Formula presented.)
data yielded the following results: (i) (Formula presented.) -ERA5
underestimates (Formula presented.) -experimental daytime at the
T3 site for both years 2014 (30%, underestimate) and 2015 (15%,
underestimate); (ii) (Formula presented.) -ERA5 overestimates
(Formula presented.) -experimental daytime at ATTO site (12%,
overestimate); (iii) during nighttime, no significant correlation
between the (Formula presented.) -experimental and (Formula
presented.) -ERA5 was observed. Based on these findings, we
propose a correction for the daytime (Formula presented.) -ERA5,
for both sites and for both years, which yields a better agreement
between experimental and ERA5 data. These results and corrections
are relevant for studies at ATTO and the T3 site and can likely
also be applied at further locations in the Amazon.",
doi = "10.3390/rs14184561",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14184561",
issn = "2072-4292",
language = "en",
targetfile = "remotesensing-14-04561-v2.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "02 maio 2024"
}